The significance of which should not be overlooked, for what it means is that good and evil do not inhabit an equal and opposite relationship, wherein they might be seen as involved in an eternal struggle, or a cyclical dynamic that could resemble, outwardly, the Chinese concept of Yin-Yang, but that ‘good,’ in the substantiative sense, is all there is, and that evil, while it can influence us, is empty, vacuous, a negation of any sort of vitality, and that it effectuates itself only through deceit and falsity, and through a perversion of what has been made, or brought into being, by way of the ‘good,’ even though it itself was formerly of the ‘good’ (in its original angelic state). Which isn’t to say that Christian theology contradicts the wisdom of the Yin-Yang, or that they are mutually exclusive, for in fact they are compatible, since the duality of that concept, most often described as ‘light’ and ‘darkness’ (and symbolized by the circle with the intertwining shapes) has never suggested a dichotomy between ‘good’ and ‘evil,’ but has always expressed ‘goodness’ alone, in all its variety, wherein ‘light’ and ‘darkness’ are merely different facets of creation, materialized from the void.