Though perhaps what I should say is that while there is no causal relationship between wealth and aesthetic sophistication (so that excessive wealth may not more frequently make the mistake that I have described — the mistake of neutering or sanitizing nature), its instances of doing so are somehow graver, or more culpable. In that the unwealthy, or even the moderately wealthy, do not have the luxury of time that the extremely wealthy have. And are likely so harried, by the demands of survival, that they cannot give as much thought to the aesthetics of their circumstances as they might like to. And so they submit to what is convenient, tolerable, or within reach. Or they do what they can, while knowing they would like to do differently, if differently was possible for them.